1 of 1 copy available
1 of 1 copy available
The Supreme Court, once the most respected institution in American government, is now routinely criticized for rendering decisions based on the individual justicesâ partisan leanings rather than on a faithful reading of the law. For legal scholar Aaron Tang, however, partisanship is not the Courtâs root problem. Overconfidence is.
Conservative and liberal justices alike have adopted a tone of uncompromising certainty in their ability to solve societyâs problems with just the right lawyerly arguments. The result is a Court that lurches stridently from one case to the next, delegitimizing opposing views and undermining public confidence in itself.
To restore the Courtâs legitimacy, Tang proposes a different approach to hard cases: one in which the Court acknowledges the arguments and interests on both sides and rules in the way that will do the least harm possible. Examining a surprising number of popular opinions where the Court has applied this approachâranging from LGBTQ rights to immigration to juvenile justiceâTang shows how the least harm principle can provide a promising and legally grounded framework for the difficult cases that divide our nation.
-
Creators
-
Publisher
-
Release date
July 4, 2023 -
Formats
-
Kindle Book
-
OverDrive Read
- ISBN: 9780300274707
-
EPUB ebook
- ISBN: 9780300274707
- File size: 531 KB
-
-
Languages
- English
Loading
Why is availability limited?
×Availability can change throughout the month based on the library's budget. You can still place a hold on the title, and your hold will be automatically filled as soon as the title is available again.
The Kindle Book format for this title is not supported on:
×Read-along ebook
×The OverDrive Read format of this ebook has professional narration that plays while you read in your browser. Learn more here.